Now that the pundits have had a full day to brood over this out-of-left-field choice for a SCOTUS Nominiee, we have some more theory as to why Bush made this decision:
Fred Barnes of the Weekly Standard has, what I think, is the best theory for the events of yesterday. Especially the last two paragraphs:
So why did Bush choose Miers? For him, these nominations are quite personal. He wants to feel comfortable with his nominee, confident his pick will be a conservative now and conservative 20 years from now. Bush picked Roberts after being impressed while interviewing him. His doubts were erased (and there were initial doubts about Roberts). My guess is with Miers his doubts were washed away too.
Conservatives shouldn’t throw up their hands in despair, at least yet. They should wait until they hear from Miers as a witness before the Senate Judiciary Committee. It’s then that we’ll begin to find out if Bush was correct in his view that she’s the person to fulfill the dreams of so many conservatives and finally shove the Supreme Court to the right.
And Barnes is not calling it cronyism.
I like reading Barnes, he writes better than he speaks. (I think when he debates, he gets tripped up over his own thoughts. When he writes, he can speak his mind uncluttered.)
At this point, I’m ready to relax and wait for the Senate hearings.